MAXDOUT Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Not my idea, but I love it !!!!! When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers need to find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well. Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of "tough decision", and his board of directors gives him a big bonus. I feel our government should not be immune from similar risks. I therefore am recommending the following cuts to be implemented by the next president elect. Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff by 25%. Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two el ections) and of course this would require some redistricting. Some yearly monetary gains include: $44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay / member / yr.) $97,175,000 for elimination of the above people's staff. (estimate $1.3 Mil in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Mil in staff per each member of the Senate every year) $240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%. $7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those members who's jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Bil lion / yr) The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and would need to improve efficiencies. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country? We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing. Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established. (telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few) Note: Congress did not hesitate to jump on a train for home this week when it was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems. Also, we have 3 senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all have been accepting full pay. These facts alone support a reduction in senators & congress. Summary of opportunity: $ 44,108,400 reduction of congress members. $282,100,000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff. $150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff. $ 59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members. $ 37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members. $ 7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members. $ 8,073,383,400 per year, estimated total savings. This is Billions people!!! Big business does these types of cuts all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegas FX400 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Nice. sounds good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1208 Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 he11 yaaaa thats what im talking about cut all the dead weight.......... and stop on raising the tax on us..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorgeloco Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 that sounds great , but now back to reality Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1208 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 that sounds great , but now back to reality thats very true jorge let get back to reality :drunks: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.